Prevalence of moderate-severe aortic stenosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis in a referral center.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is currently the most common valvular disease, with an estimated prevalence of over 4% in octogenarians. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of moderate-severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with wild type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt). Also, describe the clinical features, echocardiographic characteristics and clinical evolution. METHOD: Retrospective cohort of patients with diagnosis of ATTRwt, belonging to Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Institutional Amyloidosis Registry, from 30/11/2007 to 31/05/2021. Patients follow up was carried out through the institution clinical history. The prevalence of moderate-severe AE was estimated and presented as a percentage with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The characteristics were compared by groups according to whether or not they had moderate-severe AS. RESULTS: 104 patients with ATTRwt were included. Median follow up was 476 days [interquartile range: 192-749]. Moderate-severe AS prevalence at the ATTRwt time of diagnosis was 10.5% (n = 11; 95% CI: 5-18%). The median age of patients with AS moderate-severe at the time of diagnosis of ATTRwt was 86 years [78-91] and the male sex predominated (82%). Most of the patients had a history of heart failure (n = 8) and atrial fibrillation (n = 8) prior to the diagnosis of ATTRwt. Most of the patients were subclassified as low flow low gradient severe AS group (n = 7). Four patients underwent some intervention on the aortic valve. During follow-up, 5 patients (46%) were hospitalized for decompensated heart failure and 4 (36%) died. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the coexistence of both pathologies had a similar prevalence as reported in the international literature. It was an elderly population with a high percentage of atrial fibrillation and history of heart failure. Most of the patients presented with severe AS with low flow low gradient.

ANTECEDENTES: La estenosis aórtica (EA) es actualmente la enfermedad valvular más frecuente, con una prevalencia estimada de más del 4 % en octogenarios. OBJETIVO: Describir la prevalencia de estenosis aórtica (EA) moderada-grave en pacientes con amiloidosis por transtiretina wild type (ATTRwt). Además, describir las características clínicas, ecocardiográficas y la evolución en este grupo de pacientes. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes con diagnóstico de ATTRwt, pertenecientes al Registro Institucional de Amiloidosis del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, en el periodo del 30/11/2007 al 31/05/2021. El seguimiento de los pacientes se realizó a través de la historia clínica electrónica de la institución. Se estimó la prevalencia de EA moderada-grave, que se presenta como porcentaje con su intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC 95%). Se compararon las características por grupos según tuvieran o no EA moderada-grave. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 104 pacientes con diagnóstico de ATTRwt. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 476 días [rango intercuartílico: 192-749]. La prevalencia de EA moderada-grave al momento del diagnóstico de ATTRwt fue del 10.5% (n = 11; IC95%: 5-18%). La mediana de edad de los pacientes con EA fue de 86 años [78-91] y predominó el sexo masculino (81.8%). La mayoría de los pacientes tenían el antecedente de insuficiencia cardiaca (n = 8) y fibrilación auricular (n = 8). Predominaron los pacientes con EA grave de bajo flujo y bajo gradiente (n = 7). Cuatro pacientes fueron sometidos a alguna intervención en la válvula aórtica. Durante el seguimiento, 5 pacientes (46%) tuvieron internaciones por insuficiencia cardiaca descompensada y 4 (36%) fallecieron. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra cohorte, la coexistencia de ambas patologías tuvo una prevalencia similar a la reportada en la literatura internacional. Se trató de una población añosa con alto porcentaje de fibrilación auricular y antecedente de insuficiencia cardiaca. La mayoría presentaron EA grave de bajo flujo y bajo gradiente.

Sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine / remifentanil for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implant: A retrospective study between 2012 and 2019.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis is a therapeutic alternative for patients with severe aortic stenosis. The procedure is traditionally performed under general anaesthesia; however, sedation is now gaining in popularity because it reduces the need for vasoactive drugs and shortens the patient's stay in the critical care unit and on the ward. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety and potential benefits of sedation with dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis in terms of haemodynamic and respiratory complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 222 patients that had undergone percutaneous implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis between 2012 and 2019 under sedation with either dexmedetomidine plus remifentanil (DEX-RMF) or propofol plus remifentanil (PROPO-RMF). We collected data on complications, mainly haemodynamic and respiratory, during and after the procedure. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between sedation with dexmedetomidine and propofol (in combination with remifentanil) in terms of haemodynamic stability and intraprocedural cerebral blood oxygen. In the DEX-RMF group, however, mean blood pressure, midazolam dose, and duration of anaesthesia were lower compared with the PROPO-RMF group, but the incidence of haemodynamic and respiratory complications did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that sedation, particularly with adjuvant dexmedetomidine, is a valid anaesthetic techniques in percutaneous aortic valve prosthesis implantation.

Angina en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave sometidos a implante percutáneo de la válvula aórtica / Angina in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Introducción y objetivos: Evaluar la prevalencia, las características clínicas y el impacto de la angina en pacientes con estenosis aórtica sometidos a implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica (TAVI). Métodos: Se analizó a 1.687 pacientes consecutivos con estenosis aórtica sometidos a TAVI, clasificados en función de la presencia o ausencia basal de angina. Los datos basales, del procedimiento y del seguimiento se recogieron en una base de datos local. Resultados: Un total de 497 pacientes (29%) presentaban angina antes del TAVI. Los pacientes con angina basal presentaban peor clase funcional (NYHA> II, el 69% frente al 63%; p=0,017) y una mayor prevalencia de enfermedad coronaria (el 74% frente al 56%; p <0,001). La angina basal no mostró impacto pronóstico a 1 año en mortalidad por cualquier causa (HR=1,02; IC95%, 0,71-1,48; p=0,898) ni en mortalidad cardiovascular (HR=1,2; IC95%, 0,69-2,11; p=0,517). Sin embargo, la persistencia de angina 30 días después del procedimiento se asoció con un incremento en la mortalidad a 1 año, tanto total (HR=4,86; IC95%, 1,71-13,8; p=0,003) como de causa cardiovascular (HR=20,7; IC95%, 3,50-122,6; p=0,001). Conclusiones: Más de un cuarto de los pacientes con estenosis aórtica sometidos a TAVI tenían angina antes del procedimiento. La angina basal no mostró impacto pronóstico alguno. Sin embargo, la persistencia de angina 30 días después del procedimiento se asoció con una mayor mortalidad al año.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: To evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients with angina undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis. Methods: A total of 1687 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR at our center were included and classified according to patient-reported angina symptoms prior to the TAVR procedure. Baseline, procedural and follow-up data were collected in a dedicated database. Results: A total of 497 patients (29%) had angina prior to the TAVR procedure. Patients with angina at baseline showed a worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (NYHA class> II: 69% vs 63%; P=.017), a higher rate of coronary artery disease (74% vs 56%; P <.001), and a lower rate of complete revascularization (70% vs 79%; P <.001). Angina at baseline had no impact on all-cause mortality (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.71-1.48; P=.898) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.2; 95%CI, 0.69-2.11; P=.517) at 1 year. However, persistent angina at 30 days post-TAVR was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR, 4.86; 95%CI, 1.71-13.8; P=.003) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 20.7; 95%CI, 3.50-122.6; P=.001) at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: More than one-fourth of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR had angina prior to the procedure. Angina at baseline did not appear to be a sign of a more advanced valvular disease and had no prognostic impact; however, persistent angina at 30 days post-TAVR was associated with worse clinical outcomes.(AU)

Deterioro cognitivo tardío en pacientes con estenosis aórtica tratados con sustitución valvular quirúrgica y con implantación transcatéter de válvula aórtica: estudio comparativo / Delayed cognitive impairment in patients with aortic stenosis treated with surgical valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparative study

Introducción El deterioro cognitivo secundario a eventos cerebrovasculares es una complicación frecuente en las intervenciones de reemplazo de válvula aórtica. Nuestro objetivo es el estudio del perfil de deterioro de los pacientes sometidos a reemplazo valvular quirúrgico o implantación de prótesis transcatéter (TAVI) y si éste resulta diferente según la intervención a la que son sometidos y los factores de riesgo basales. Pacientes y métodos Estudio observacional prospectivo, con dos grupos no equivalentes de pacientes (grupo TAVI y grupo quirúrgico). Se realizaron comparaciones intergrupo en varios dominios cognitivos, con una evaluación basal y mediciones de seguimiento seis y 12 meses después la intervención. Resultados El grupo TAVI presentó resultados inferiores al grupo quirúrgico en funciones ejecutivas y visuoespaciales, puntuaciones parcialmente determinadas por la edad (p < 0,01) y el nivel intelectual previo (Pearson cociente intelectual previo-medias escalares en los test: 0,665; p < 0,001). La media de puntuaciones en los tres momentos de medición indica una disminución del rendimiento en funciones ejecutivas a los seis meses, que se recupera a los 12 meses. En memoria se registraron incrementos sostenidos en ambos momentos, en tanto que la función visuoespacial y la denominación no mostraron recuperación posterior de los niveles basales. Estas tendencias son similares en los dos grupos. Conclusión Los resultados obtenidos no confirman la instauración de un proceso específico de deterioro neurocognitivo postintervención en la estenosis aórtica complicada. El perfil de deterioro no presenta diferencias significativas entre los grupos, pero es más evidente en los pacientes con TAVI, debido a la influencia de las variables de selección de la muestra. (AU)

INTRODUCTION Cognitive impairment secondary to cerebrovascular events is a common complication of aortic valve replacement interventions. Our aim is to study the deterioration profile of patients who have undergone surgical valve replacement or transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI) and whether it differs according to the intervention they underwent and their baseline risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective observational study with two non-equivalent groups of patients (TAVI group and surgical group) Intergroup comparisons were carried out in several cognitive domains, with a baseline assessment and follow-up measurements six and 12 months after the intervention. RESULTS The TAVI group performed less well than the surgical group in executive and visuospatial functions, with scores partially determined by age (p < 0.01) and prior intellectual level (Pearson prior intelligence quotient-scalar test means: 0.665; p < 0.001). Mean scores at the three measurement points indicate a decline in executive function performance at six months, which is restored at 12 months. Sustained increases in memory were recorded at both time points, while visuospatial function and naming showed no subsequent recovery of the baseline levels. These trends are similar in both groups. CONCLUSION. The results obtained do not confirm the appearance of a specific process of post-intervention neurocognitive impairment in complicated aortic stenosis. The deterioration profile does not show any significant differences between groups, but is more evident in TAVI patients, due to the influence of variables related to sample selection. (AU)

Incidence, predictors, and prognostic significance of impaired functional status early after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There are scarce data on the factors associated with impaired functional status after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and its clinical impact. This study aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of impaired functional class (NYHA class III-IV) following TAVR. METHODS: This multicenter study included 3462 transarterial TAVR patients receiving newer generation devices. The patients were compared according to their NYHA class at 1 month of follow-up (NYHA I-II vs NYHA III-IV). A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the predictors of 30-day NYHA class III-IV. Patient survival was compared with the Kaplan-Meier method and factors associated with decreased survival were identified with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 80.3±7.3 years, with 47% of women, and a median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 3.8% [IQR, 2.5-5.8]. A total of 208 patients (6%) were in NYHA class III-IV 1 month after TAVR. Predictors of 30-day NYHA class III-IV were baseline NYHA class III-IV (OR, 1.76; 95%CI, 1.08-2.89; P=.02), chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (OR, 1.80; 95%CI, 1.13-2.83; P=.01), and post-TAVR severe mitral regurgitation (OR, 2.00; 95%CI, 1.21-3.31; P<.01). Patients in NYHA class III-IV 1 month after TAVR were at higher risk of death (HR, 3.68; 95%CI, 2.39-5.70; P<.01) and heart failure-related hospitalization (HR, 6.00; 95%CI, 3.76-9.60; P<.01) at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 6% of contemporary TAVR patients exhibited an impaired functional status following TAVR. Worse baseline NYHA class, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, and severe mitral regurgitation predicted 30-day NYHA class III/IV, and this determined a higher risk of mortality and heart failure hospitalization at 1-year follow-up. Further studies on the prevention and treatment optimization of patients with impaired functional status after TAVR are needed.

Última generación de prótesis percutáneas expandibles con balón y autoexpandibles en la estenosis aórtica bicúspide: estudio TRITON / Latest-iteration balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter valves for severe bicuspid aortic stenosis: the TRITON study

Introducción y objetivos: La última generación de válvulas cardiacas expandibles con balón y autoexpandibles para implante percutáneo no se han comparado en valvulopatía aórtica bicúspide (VAB).Métodos: Registro multicéntrico de pacientes consecutivos con VAB y estenosis grave tratados con las válvulas cardiacas expandibles con balón (Myval y SAPIEN 3 Ultra [S3U]) o autoexpandible Evolut PRO+(EP+). Se realizó un análisis de tripletes mediante el software TriMatch para minimizar el impacto de las diferencias basales. El objetivo primario del estudio fue evaluar la tasa de éxito del dispositivo a 30 días y los objetivos secundarios, el objetivo combinado de seguridad y sus componentes individuales a 30 días.Resultados: Se incluyó a 360 pacientes (media de edad, 76,6±7,6 años; el 71,9% varones); 122 con Myval (33,9%), 129 con S3U (35,8%) y 109 con EP+(30,3%). La media de puntuación STS fue de 3,6±1,9%. No hubo ningún caso de oclusión coronaria, rotura de anillo, disección aórtica o mortalidad periprocedimiento. El evento primario de éxito del dispositivo a 30-días fue significativamente superior en el grupo que recibió Myval (Myval, 100%; S3U, 87,5%, y EP+, 81,3%), fundamentalmente a expensas de mayor gradiente residual con S3U y mayor tasa de insuficiencia aórtica al menos moderada con EP+. La tasa no ajustada de implante de marcapasos no presentó diferencias significativas.Conclusiones: En la VAB con estenosis grave y cirugía contraindicada, Myval, S3U y EP+tuvieron una seguridad comparable, aunque Myval presentó mejor gradiente residual que S3U y ambos dispositivos expandibles con balón resultaron en menos fuga perivalvular residual que EP+. Por lo tanto, ajustándose a los riesgos específicos de cada paciente, se puede seleccionar cualquiera de los 3 dispositivos con resultados óptimos.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: No comparisons have been published yet regarding the newest iteration of balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis.Methods: Multicenter registry of consecutive patients with severe BAV stenosis treated with balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (Myval and SAPIEN 3 Ultra, S3U) or self-expanding Evolut PRO+(EP+). TriMatch analysis was carried out to minimize the impact of baseline differences. The primary endpoint of the study was 30-day device success, and the secondary endpoints were the composite and individual components of early safety at 30 days.Results: A total of 360 patients (age 76.6±7.6 years, 71.9% males) were included: 122 Myval (33.9%), 129 S3U (35.8%), and 109 EP+(30.3%). The mean STS score was 3.6±1.9%. There were no cases of coronary artery occlusion, annulus rupture, aortic dissection, or procedural death. The primary endpoint of device success at 30 days was significantly higher in the Myval group (Myval: 100%; S3U: 87.5%; and EP+: 81.3%), mainly due to higher residual aortic gradients with S3U and greater≥moderate aortic regurgitation (AR) with EP+. No significant differences were found in the unadjusted rate of pacemaker implantation.Conclusions: In patients with BAV stenosis deemed unsuitable for surgery, Myval, S3U and EP+showed similar safety but balloon-expandable Myval had better gradients than S3U, and both balloon-expandable devices had lower residual AR than EP+, suggesting that, taking into consideration the patient-specific risks, any of these devices can be selected with optimal outcomes.(AU)

Impacto de un Heart Team en pacientes con estenosis aórtica candidatos a reemplazo percutáneo / Impact of a Heart Team in patients with aortic stenosis who are candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

RESUMEN La difusión del reemplazo valvular aórtico percutáneo (TAVI) en la estenosis aórtica (EAo) generó la creación de un Heart Team (HT), para elegir el mejor tratamiento. Existen pocos reportes sobre su utilidad. Objetivos: analizar los resultados del tratamiento de los pacientes con EAo evaluados por un HT durante 10 años Material y métodos: Inclusión consecutiva de todos los pacientes con EAo candidatos a TAVI entre enero del 2012 y julio del 2021 para seleccionar el mejor tratamiento, incluyendo además Cirugía de reemplazo valvular aórtico (CRVA) y Tratamiento médico conservador (TMC). Resultados: De 841 pacientes, se asignaron a TAVI 455 (53%), CRVA 213 (24%) y TMC 183 (23%). El porcentaje asignado a TAVI aumentó con el tiempo de 48 a 62% (p < 0,05). Los pacientes que fueron a TAVI, con respecto a los enviados a CRVA, eran mayores (86 ± 7 vs 83 ± 7 años), con mayor EUROSCORE II (6,2, IC95% 5,7-6,6 vs 5,6, IC95% 4,4-6,5) y más frágiles (1,62 ± 1 vs 0,91 ± 1), en todos los casos p <0,01. La sobrevida actuarial (IC 95%) a 1 y a 2 años fue, para TAVI 88% (84-91%) y 82% (77-86%), para CRVA 83% (76-88%) y 78% (70-84%) y para TMC 70% (60-87%) y 59% (48-68%) respectivamente (p <0,001). Conclusiones: Durante los primeros 10 años de establecido un Heart Team para la toma de decisiones en EAo, se asignaron a TAVI aproximadamente la mitad y el resto se asignó por mitades a cirugía u observación. La sobrevida de los pacientes intervenidos fue similar a 2 años y mayor que la de los no intervenidos.

ABSTRACT As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis (AS) became widespread, the need for a Heart Team (HT) arose to choose the best treatment. There are few reports regarding its usefulness. Objectives: To analyze treatment outcomes in patients with AS evaluated by a HT for 10 years. Methods: Consecutive enrollment of all patients with AS who were candidates for TAVI between January 2012 and July 2021 to choose the best treatment, including surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and conservative medical management (CMM). Results: Out of 841 patients, 455 were assigned to TAVI (53%), 213 to SAVR (24%), and 183 to CMM (23%). The percentage assigned to TAVI has increased from 48% to 62% over time (p <0.05). Patients who underwent TAVI versus those who underwent SAVR were older (86 ± 7 vs. 83 ± 7 years), had a higher EUROSCORE II (6.2, 95% CI 5.7-6.6 vs. 5.6; 95% CI 4.4-6.5) and were frailer (1.62 ± 1 vs. 0.91 ± 1), in all cases p <0.01. Actuarial survival (95% CI) at 1 and 2 years was 88% (84-91%) and 82% (77-86%) for TAVI, 83% (76-88%) and 78% (70-84%) for SAVR, and 70% (60-87%) and 59% (48-68%) for CMM, respectively (p <0.001). Conclusions: For the first 10 years after a Heart Team was established for AS decision-making, approximately half of the patients were assigned to TAVI, and the rest were equally assigned in halves to either surgery or observation. Survival for patients who received interventions was similar at 2 years and higher than in those who did not.

Los niveles de ST2 soluble están relacionados con la fibrosis miocárdica de sustitución en la estenosis aórtica grave / Soluble ST2 levels are related to replacement myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis

Introducción y objetivos: Los pacientes con estenosis aórtica presentan remodelado del ventrículo izquierdo (VI) y fibrosis miocárdica de sustitución (FMS). Se desconoce si sST2 se asocia con la FMS medida por resonancia magnética y con el sexo. Métodos: Se incluyó a 79 pacientes consecutivos (73,0 [68,0-78,0] años; 61% varones) con estenosis aórtica grave aislada tratados con sustitución valvular. Se identificaron y cuantificaron la FMS mediante realce tardío post-gadolinio (RTG) y se valoró el sST2 sérico. Resultados: La FMS se asoció con sST2 elevado, hipertrofia y dilatación del VI y menor fracción de eyección del VI. Todos los pacientes con disfunción del VI tenían FMS. sST2 ≥ 28,2 ng/ml se asoció con FMS y mayor hipertrofia del VI. La masa de RTG se correlacionó con el remodelado del VI y sST2. Los niveles de sST2 fueron mayores en pacientes con fibrosis intramiocárdica frente a subendocárdica. El análisis multivariante evidenció que solo la fracción de eyección y sST2 se asociaban con la FMS. Los varones presentaron mayores niveles de FMS y sST2. En varones la FMS correlacionó con mayor dilatación e hipertrofia ventricular, y con la masa de RTG. Conclusiones: El sST2 es un factor independiente de FMS en la estenosisi aórtica grave aislada. sST2 ≥ 28,2 ng/ml predice la FMS y se relaciona con mayor hipertrofia del VI. La expresión de sST2 y asociaciones clínicas deben ser sexo-específicas.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) exhibit left ventricular (LV) remodeling and replacement myocardial fibrosis (RMF). Whether sST2 is associated with RMF measured by cardiac magnetic resonance and with sex remains unknown. Methods: We recruited 79 consecutive patients (73.0 [68.0-78.0] years; 61% men) with severe isolated AS underdoing valve replacement. RMF was identified and quantified by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Serum sST2 levels were determined. Results: RMF was associated with higher circulating sST2 levels, LV hypertrophy and dilation, and lower LV ejection fraction. All patients with LV dysfunction had RMF. Circulating levels of sST2 ≥ 28.8 ng/mL were associated with RMF and greater LV hypertrophy. LGE mass was correlated with LV remodeling and sST2. Of note, sST2 levels were also associated with the RMF pattern, being higher in midwall than in subendocardial fibrosis. Multivariate analyses showed that only LV ejection fraction and sST2 levels were associated with RMF. Moreover, men had higher levels of sST2 and RMF. RMF was associated with higher LV dilation and hypertrophy only in men and was correlated with LGE mass. Conclusions: SST2 was an independent factor for RMF in patients with severe isolated AS. The presence of RMF was predicted by sST2 ≥ 28.2 ng/mL, and was associated with greater LV hypertrophy. sST2 expression and clinical associations may be sex-specific.(AU)

Valoración de la relación clínico-ultrasonográfica en la estenosis aórtica

Introducción: El incremento exponencial de la incidencia de la estenosis aórtica en relación con la edad, al igual que la presencia de factores de riesgo como el síndrome metabólico, predisponen a la calcificación aórtica como una manifestación de enfermedad cardiovascular generalizada. Objetivo: Identificar las incongruencias existentes entre las manifestaciones clínicas y el estudio ecocardiográfico en pacientes con estenosis valvular aórtica severa. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo-analítico en una muestra conformada por 50 pacientes diagnosticados, clínica y ecográficamente, de estenosis aórtica severa. Resultados: Se halló predomino de féminas blancas de la tercera edad con historia de dolor anginoso y disnea, acompañados de soplo mesosistólico intenso en foco aórtico, y un segundo ruido débil, y cifras tensionales bajas con pocos criterios ultrasonográficos de hipertrofia del ventrículo izquierdo y velocidad pico, unido al gradiente y el área aórtica, sugestivos de estenosis severa en un elevado por ciento, con calcificación de válvulas y una fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo elevada, junto a la presencia de otras valvulopatías. Conclusiones: El estudio demostró pobre correlación entre las manifestaciones clínicas y las ecocardiográficas.

Introduction: The exponential increase of aortic stenosis incidence in relation to age, as well as the presence of risk factors such as metabolic syndrome, predispose to aortic calcification as a manifestation of a generalized cardiovascular disease. Objective: To identify the incongruences existing between clinical manifestations and the echocardiographic study in patients with severe aortic valvular stenosis. Materials and methods: An analytical-descriptive study was carried out in a sample of 50 patients clinically and echo-graphically diagnosed of severe aortic stenosis. Results: A predominance of elder white women with a history of anginous pain and dyspnea was found, accompanied of intense meso-systolic murmur in aortic focus, and a second weak sound, and low blood tension figures with few ultrasonographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy and peak velocity, together with gradient and aortic area, which suggest a high-percent of severe stenosis, with valvular calcification and an elevated left ventricular elevation fraction, plus the presence of other valvular diseases. Conclusions: The study showed poor relationship between clinical and echocardiography manifestations.

Angina in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients with angina undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: A total of 1687 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR at our center were included and classified according to patient-reported angina symptoms prior to the TAVR procedure. Baseline, procedural and follow-up data were collected in a dedicated database. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients (29%) had angina prior to the TAVR procedure. Patients with angina at baseline showed a worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (NYHA class> II: 69% vs 63%; P=.017), a higher rate of coronary artery disease (74% vs 56%; P <.001), and a lower rate of complete revascularization (70% vs 79%; P <.001). Angina at baseline had no impact on all-cause mortality (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.71-1.48; P=.898) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.2; 95%CI, 0.69-2.11; P=.517) at 1 year. However, persistent angina at 30 days post-TAVR was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR, 4.86; 95%CI, 1.71-13.8; P=.003) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 20.7; 95%CI, 3.50-122.6; P=.001) at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-fourth of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR had angina prior to the procedure. Angina at baseline did not appear to be a sign of a more advanced valvular disease and had no prognostic impact; however, persistent angina at 30 days post-TAVR was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Reemplazo endovascular aórtico en un paciente con enfermedad de válvula aórtica bicúspide / Endovascular aortic replacement in a patient with bicuspid aortic valve disease

Resumen Un varón de 49 años ingresó en la unidad de cuidados coronarios, con antecedentes de miocardiopatía dilatada, con función sistólica del ventrículo izquierdo gravemente deteriorada y estenosis aórtica grave de origen bicúspide, sintomático para síncope, ángor y disnea de reciente diagnóstico. Durante la internación evolucionó con shock cardiogénico que requirió doble soporte inotrópico. Por presentar alto riesgo quirúrgico y elevada probabilidad de rechazo ante un eventual trasplante cardiaco, según sus estudios de histocompatibilidad, se procedió al reemplazo transcatéter de la válvula aortica, con evolución favorable.

Abstract A 49-year-old male with a history of left ventricular systolic function dilated cardiomyopathy and severe symptomatic bicuspid aortic stenosis recently diagnosed (syncope, chest pain and dyspnea) was admitted to the coronary care unit. During hospitalization, he developed cardiogenic shock requiring double inotropic support. High surgical risk and an elevated chance of graft rejection contraindicated surgical replacement or heart transplant. We performed a transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a favorable evolution.

Latest-iteration balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter valves for severe bicuspid aortic stenosis: the TRITON study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: No comparisons have been published yet regarding the newest iteration of balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. METHODS: Multicenter registry of consecutive patients with severe BAV stenosis treated with balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (Myval and SAPIEN 3 Ultra, S3U) or self-expanding Evolut PRO+(EP+). TriMatch analysis was carried out to minimize the impact of baseline differences. The primary endpoint of the study was 30-day device success, and the secondary endpoints were the composite and individual components of early safety at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients (age 76.6±7.6 years, 71.9% males) were included: 122 Myval (33.9%), 129 S3U (35.8%), and 109 EP+(30.3%). The mean STS score was 3.6±1.9%. There were no cases of coronary artery occlusion, annulus rupture, aortic dissection, or procedural death. The primary endpoint of device success at 30 days was significantly higher in the Myval group (Myval: 100%; S3U: 87.5%; and EP+: 81.3%), mainly due to higher residual aortic gradients with S3U and greater≥moderate aortic regurgitation (AR) with EP+. No significant differences were found in the unadjusted rate of pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BAV stenosis deemed unsuitable for surgery, Myval, S3U and EP+showed similar safety but balloon-expandable Myval had better gradients than S3U, and both balloon-expandable devices had lower residual AR than EP+, suggesting that, taking into consideration the patient-specific risks, any of these devices can be selected with optimal outcomes.

Impacto clínico de la extensión del miocardio en riesgo en pacientes sometidos a intervención percutánea de la válvula aórtica / Clinical impact of the extent of jeopardized myocardium in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention

Introducción y objetivos La enfermedad coronaria (EC) se encuentra en el 30-50% de los pacientes con estenosis aórtica (EA) grave que reciben tratamiento intervencionista. Todavía no está claro cuál es el mejor tratamiento de la EAC en pacientes con EA sometidos a implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica (TAVI). El objetivo del estudio fue analizar el impacto clínico del miocardio en riesgo en pacientes con EAC y EA grave tratados con TAVI. Métodos Se incluyó a pacientes consecutivos sometidos a TAVI en nuestro hospital. En presencia de EAC, el miocardio en riesgo antes del procedimiento se clasificó utilizando la puntuación de riesgo (JS) de la British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS). La población de estudio se dividió en 3 grupos: pacientes sin EAC concomitante (grupo No-EAC), pacientes con EAC y BCIS-JS ≤ 4 (grupo EAC BCIS-JS ≤ 4) y pacientes con EAC concomitante y BCIS-JS> 4 (grupo EAD BCIS -JS> 4). El objetivo primario del estudio fueron los eventos cardiovasculares y cerebrovasculares adversos mayores (MACCE). Resultados Se incluyó a un total de 403 pacientes: 223 No-EAD, 94 EAC BCIS-JS ≤ 4 y 86 EAC BCIS-JS> 4. Con 3 meses de seguimiento [rango 104 – 3.296 días], los pacientes sin EAC y los pacientes con EAC con BCIS-JS ≤ 4 tuvieron una mejor supervivencia libre de MACCE en comparación con aquellos con revascularización menos extensa (BCIS-JS> 4) (p=0,049). Este resultado se debió en parte a una reducción significativa de la mortalidad (p=0,031). En el análisis multivariado, el BCIS-JS residual ≤ 4 y la clase III-IV de la NYHA predijeron MACCE de forma independiente. Conclusiones En pacientes con EAC y EA grave, la extensión del miocardio en riesgo antes del TAVI influye en los resultados clínicos (AU)

Introduction and objectives Coronary artery disease (CAD) is found in 30%-50% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing treatment. The best management of CAD in AS patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still unclear. We investigated the clinical impact of the extent of jeopardized myocardium in patients with concomitant CAD and severe AS treated by TAVI. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent TAVI procedures at our hospital were identified. In the presence of CAD, the myocardium jeopardized before TAVI was graded using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) jeopardy score (JS). The study population was divided in 3 groups: patients without concomitant CAD (no-CAD), patients with CAD and BCIS-JS ≤ 4 (CAD BCIS-JS ≤ 4) and patients with concomitant CAD and BCIS-JS> 4 (CAD BCIS-JS> 4). The primary study endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results A total of 403 patients entered the study: 223 no-CAD, 94 CAD BCIS-JS ≤ 4 and 86 CAD BCIS-JS> 4. At> 3 months of follow-up [range 104–3296 days], patients without CAD and CAD patients with BCIS-JS ≤ 4 had better survival free from MACCE compared with those with less extensive revascularization (BCIS-JS> 4) (P=.049). This result was driven by a significant reduction in death (P=.031). On multivariate analysis, residual BCIS-JS ≤ 4 and NYHA class III-IV independently predicted MACCE. Conclusions In patients with concomitant CAD and severe AS, the extent of jeopardized myocardium before TAVI impacts on clinical outcomes (AU)

Deterioro cognitivo en el paciente mayor con estenosis aórtica grave sintomática. Toma de decisiones terapéuticas e impacto sobre la mortalidad al año / Cognitive impairment in the elderly patient with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Therapeutic decisions and impact on one-year mortality

Introducción: El tratamiento intervencionista de la estenosis aórtica grave incluye el recambio valvular mediante cirugía o vía transcatéter –implante transcatéter de la válvula aórtica (TAVI)–. Para realizar una adecuada selección y descartar pacientes con escaso/nulo beneficio terapéutico, se recomienda evaluar las comorbilidades, la fragilidad y el deterioro cognitivo. Objetivos: a) Determinar la prevalencia de deterioro cognitivo en pacientes mayores con estenosis aórtica grave; b) analizar su influencia en la toma de decisiones (cirugía, TAVI o tratamiento conservador), y c) analizar su impacto sobre la mortalidad al año. Material y métodos. Estudio epidemiológico longitudinal y prospectivo sobre pacientes de 75 años o más con estenosis aórtica grave atendidos por el Heart-Team. Variables: sociodemográficas, clínicas, cardiológicas, funcionales y mentales; deterioro cognitivo evaluado aplicando el Minimental State Examination (MMSE). Resultados: Incluimos a 300 pacientes en el estudio (83,99 ± 4,02 años; 61,2%, mujeres). Prevalencia de deterioro cognitivo del 15,3%, que se asoció con el nivel de albúmina –odds ratio (OR): 0,082; p = 0,011– y las puntuaciones en los índices de Barthel (OR: 0,962; p = 0,02) y Lawton (OR: 0,787; p = 0,025). En el 24,7% de los casos se decidió cirugía; en el 63,3%, TAVI; y en el 12%, tratamiento conservador. Esta decisión se asoció con la puntuación en los índices de Barthel (OR: 0,93; p = 0,012) y Lawton (OR: 0,678; p = 0,014), la Short Physical Performance Battery (OR: 0,75; p = 0,037) y el MMSE (OR: 0,691; p < 0,001). La mortalidad al año fue del 14%, superior en los pacientes con puntuaciones en el MMSE <24 (23,5% frente a 12,8%; p = 0,094). Conclusiones: El deterioro cognitivo es un síndrome geriátrico muy frecuente en pacientes mayores con estenosis aórtica grave que se asocia con incapacidad funcional en las actividades de la vida diaria...(AU)

Introduction: Interventional treatment of severe aortic stenosis includes valve replacement by surgery or transcatheter – transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In order to make an adequate selection and to rule out patients with little/no therapeutic benefit, it is recommended to assess comorbidities, frailty and cognitive impairment. Aims: a) To determine the prevalence of cognitive impairment in older patients with severe aortic stenosis; b) to analyse its influence on decision-making (surgery, TAVI or conservative treatment); and c) to analyse its impact on mortality at one year. Material and methods: Prospective, longitudinal epidemiological study of patients aged 75 years and older with severe aortic stenosis treated by the Heart-Team. Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, cardiological, functional and mental variables; cognitive impairment assessed by applying the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results: We included 300 patients in the study (83.99 ± 4.02 years old; 61.2%, women). Prevalence of cognitive impairment of 15.3%, which was associated with albumin level – odds ratio (OR): 0.082; p = 0.011 – and Barthel (OR: 0.962; p = 0.02) and Lawton (OR: 0.787; p = 0.025) index scores. Surgery was chosen in 24.7% of cases; TAVI in 63.3%; and conservative treatment in 12%. This decision was associated with the score on the Barthel (OR: 0.93; p = 0.012) and Lawton indices (OR: 0.678; p = 0.014), the Short Physical Performance Battery (OR: 0.75; p = 0.037) and the MMSE (OR: 0.691; p < 0.001). Mortality at one year was 14%, and higher in patients with MMSE scores <24 (23.5% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.094). Conclusions: Cognitive impairment is a very common geriatric syndrome in older patients with severe aortic stenosis that is associated with functional disability in activities of daily living. Cognitive impairment has a high impact on decision-making and appears to be a variable associated with increased mortality.(AU)

Esperanza de vida después del recambio valvular debido a estenosis aórtica de bajo gradiente con función ventricular conservada / Life expectancy after surgical aortic valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction

Introducción y objetivos: El recambio valvular aórtico (RVAo) quirúrgico puede modificar la historia natural de la estenosis aórtica grave (EAoG). Sin embargo, comparado con la población general, estos pacientes tienen una pérdida en su esperanza de vida. La esperanza de vida de los pacientes intervenidos de RVAo debido a EAoG de bajo gradiente con fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) conservada se desconoce. Métodos: Se incluyó a todos los pacientes entre 50 y 65 años sometidos a RVAo quirúrgico aislado en 27 centros durante 18 años. Analizamos la supervivencia observada y esperada a los 18 años de pacientes con EAoG de bajo gradiente con FEVI conservada y todos los otros tipos de EAoG. Mediante emparejamiento basado en índice de propensión, comparamos la esperanza de vida de los pacientes con EAoG de bajo gradiente con FEVI conservada vs EAoG de alto gradiente con FEVI conservada. Resultados: Se analizó a 5.084 pacientes, 413 con EAoG de bajo gradiente con FEVI conservada. En estos pacientes, la supervivencia observada a 10, 15 y 18 años fue 86,6% (IC95%, 85,3-87,8), 75% (IC95%, 72,7-77,2) y 63,5% (IC95%, 58,8-67,8). La supervivencia esperada a 10, 15 y 18 años fue 90,2%, 82,1% y 75,7%. En la muestra emparejada, la supervivencia de los pacientes con EAoG de bajo gradiente con FEVI conservada fue similar a la de aquellos con EAoG de alto gradiente con FEVI conservada, test de log-rank p=0,95, HR=1 (IC95%, 0,7–1,4; p=0,95). Conclusiones: Existe una pérdida en la esperanza de vida en todos los tipos de EAoG después del RVAo. Esta pérdida es mayor en los pacientes con disfunción ventricular y menor en los pacientes con EAoG de bajo gradiente o alto gradiente con FEVI conservada. El beneficio de la cirugía es similar entre estos 2 últimos grupos.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) can modify the natural history of severe aortic stenosis (SAS). However, compared with the general population, these patients have a loss of life expectancy. The life expectancy of patients who undergo SAVR due to low-gradient SAS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unknown. Methods: We included all patients between 50 and 65 years who underwent isolated SAVR in 27 Spanish centers during an 18-year period. We analyzed observed and expected survival at 18 years in patients with low-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF and all other types of SAS. We used propensity score matching to compare the life expectancy of patients with low-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF vs those with high-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF. Results: We analyzed 5084 patients, of whom 413 had low-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF. For these patients, observed survival at 10, 15 and 18 years was 86.6% (95%CI, 85.3-87.8), 75% (95%CI, 72.7-77.2), and 63.5% (95%CI, 58.8-67.8). Expected survival at 10, 15 and 18 years was 90.2%, 82.1%, and 75.7%. In the matched sample, survival of patients with low-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF was similar to that of patients with high-gradient with preserved LVEF, log-rank test, P=.95; HR=1 (95%CI, 0.7–1.4; P=.95). Conclusions: There is a loss of life expectancy in patients with all types of SAS undergoing SAVR. This loss is higher in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and lower in patients with low-gradient or high-gradient aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF. The benefit of surgery is similar between these last 2 groups.(AU)

Imagen multimodal en la estenosis aórtica: nuevas fronteras diagnósticas y terapéuticas / Multimodality imaging in aortic stenosis: new diagnostic and therapeutic frontiers

El desarrollo del implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica ha revolucionado el tratamiento de la estenosis de válvula aórtica calcificada. Los pacientes ancianos a los que se consideraba inoperables ahora cuentan con un tratamiento eficaz y seguro que proporciona una mejor supervivencia. Además, las guías de práctica actuales tienden a recomendar una intervención más temprana para evitar las consecuencias irreversibles de la sobrecarga de presión de larga duración causada por la válvula aórtica estenótica. El momento adecuado para la intervención depende en gran medida de las técnicas de imagen que informan de la gravedad de la estenosis aórtica, pero también de las consecuencias hemodinámicas y el remodelado cardiaco. Si bien la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo sigue siendo uno de los principales parámetros funcionales para la estratificación del riesgo de los pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave, los avances en las técnicas de imagen han proporcionado nuevos parámetros estructurales y funcionales que permiten identificar a los pacientes que se beneficiarán de la intervención antes de que aparezcan síntomas o daño cardiaco irreversible. Además, el desarrollo de tratamientos médicos que pueden detener de manera efectiva la progresión de la estenosis aórtica depende en gran medida de la información que las técnicas de imagen aportan, y la caracterización de la actividad metabólica de la estenosis aórtica calcificada con técnicas de medicina nuclear o tomografía computarizada ha permitido monitorizar los efectos de esos tratamientos. El presente artículo de revisión brinda una visión actualizada de los avances en técnicas de imagen que caracterizan la fisiopatología y han cambiado el paradigma del tratamiento de la estenosis aórtica.(AU)

The advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation has revolutionized the treatment of calcific aortic valve stenosis. Elderly patients who were previously considered inoperable have currently an efficacious and safe therapy that provides better survival. In addition, current practice guidelines tend to recommend earlier intervention to avoid the irreversible consequences of long-lasting pressure overload caused by the stenotic aortic valve. Appropriate timing of the intervention relies significantly on imaging techniques that provide information on the severity of the aortic stenosis as well as on the hemodynamic consequences and cardiac remodeling. While left ventricular ejection fraction remains one of the main functional parameters for risk stratification in patients with severe aortic stenosis, advances in imaging techniques have provided new structural and functional parameters that allow the identification of patients who will benefit from intervention before the occurrence of symptoms or irreversible cardiac damage. Furthermore, ongoing research aiming to identify the medical therapies that can effectively halt the progression of aortic stenosis relies heavily on imaging endpoints, and new imaging techniques that characterize the metabolic activity of calcific aortic stenosis have been proposed to monitor the effects of these therapies. The present review provides an up-to-date overview of the imaging advances that characterizes the pathophysiology and that have changed the management paradigm of aortic stenosis.(AU)

Clinical impact of the extent of jeopardized myocardium in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is found in 30%-50% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing treatment. The best management of CAD in AS patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still unclear. We investigated the clinical impact of the extent of jeopardized myocardium in patients with concomitant CAD and severe AS treated by TAVI. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent TAVI procedures at our hospital were identified. In the presence of CAD, the myocardium jeopardized before TAVI was graded using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) jeopardy score (JS). The study population was divided in 3 groups: patients without concomitant CAD (no-CAD), patients with CAD and BCIS-JS ≤ 4 (CAD BCIS-JS ≤ 4) and patients with concomitant CAD and BCIS-JS> 4 (CAD BCIS-JS> 4). The primary study endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: A total of 403 patients entered the study: 223 no-CAD, 94 CAD BCIS-JS ≤ 4 and 86 CAD BCIS-JS> 4. At> 3 months of follow-up [range 104-3296 days], patients without CAD and CAD patients with BCIS-JS ≤ 4 had better survival free from MACCE compared with those with less extensive revascularization (BCIS-JS> 4) (P=.049). This result was driven by a significant reduction in death (P=.031). On multivariate analysis, residual BCIS-JS ≤ 4 and NYHA class III-IV independently predicted MACCE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with concomitant CAD and severe AS, the extent of jeopardized myocardium before TAVI impacts on clinical outcomes.

Multimodality imaging in aortic stenosis: new diagnostic and therapeutic frontiers.

The advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation has revolutionized the treatment of calcific aortic valve stenosis. Elderly patients who were previously considered inoperable have currently an efficacious and safe therapy that provides better survival. In addition, current practice guidelines tend to recommend earlier intervention to avoid the irreversible consequences of long-lasting pressure overload caused by the stenotic aortic valve. Appropriate timing of the intervention relies significantly on imaging techniques that provide information on the severity of the aortic stenosis as well as on the hemodynamic consequences and cardiac remodeling. While left ventricular ejection fraction remains one of the main functional parameters for risk stratification in patients with severe aortic stenosis, advances in imaging techniques have provided new structural and functional parameters that allow the identification of patients who will benefit from intervention before the occurrence of symptoms or irreversible cardiac damage. Furthermore, ongoing research aiming to identify the medical therapies that can effectively halt the progression of aortic stenosis relies heavily on imaging endpoints, and new imaging techniques that characterize the metabolic activity of calcific aortic stenosis have been proposed to monitor the effects of these therapies. The present review provides an up-to-date overview of the imaging advances that characterizes the pathophysiology and that have changed the management paradigm of aortic stenosis.

Life expectancy after surgical aortic valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) can modify the natural history of severe aortic stenosis (SAS). However, compared with the general population, these patients have a loss of life expectancy. The life expectancy of patients who undergo SAVR due to low-gradient SAS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unknown. METHODS: We included all patients between 50 and 65 years who underwent isolated SAVR in 27 Spanish centers during an 18-year period. We analyzed observed and expected survival at 18 years in patients with low-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF and all other types of SAS. We used propensity score matching to compare the life expectancy of patients with low-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF vs those with high-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF. RESULTS: We analyzed 5084 patients, of whom 413 had low-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF. For these patients, observed survival at 10, 15 and 18 years was 86.6% (95%CI, 85.3-87.8), 75% (95%CI, 72.7-77.2), and 63.5% (95%CI, 58.8-67.8). Expected survival at 10, 15 and 18 years was 90.2%, 82.1%, and 75.7%. In the matched sample, survival of patients with low-gradient SAS with preserved LVEF was similar to that of patients with high-gradient with preserved LVEF, log-rank test, P=.95; HR=1 (95%CI, 0.7-1.4; P=.95). CONCLUSIONS: There is a loss of life expectancy in patients with all types of SAS undergoing SAVR. This loss is higher in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and lower in patients with low-gradient or high-gradient aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF. The benefit of surgery is similar between these last 2 groups.

Soluble ST2 levels are related to replacement myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) exhibit left ventricular (LV) remodeling and replacement myocardial fibrosis (RMF). Whether sST2 is associated with RMF measured by cardiac magnetic resonance and with sex remains unknown. METHODS: We recruited 79 consecutive patients (73.0 [68.0-78.0] years; 61% men) with severe isolated AS underdoing valve replacement. RMF was identified and quantified by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Serum sST2 levels were determined. RESULTS: RMF was associated with higher circulating sST2 levels, LV hypertrophy and dilation, and lower LV ejection fraction. All patients with LV dysfunction had RMF. Circulating levels of sST2 ≥ 28.8 ng/mL were associated with RMF and greater LV hypertrophy. LGE mass was correlated with LV remodeling and sST2. Of note, sST2 levels were also associated with the RMF pattern, being higher in midwall than in subendocardial fibrosis. Multivariate analyses showed that only LV ejection fraction and sST2 levels were associated with RMF. Moreover, men had higher levels of sST2 and RMF. RMF was associated with higher LV dilation and hypertrophy only in men and was correlated with LGE mass. CONCLUSIONS: SST2 was an independent factor for RMF in patients with severe isolated AS. The presence of RMF was predicted by sST2 ≥ 28.2 ng/mL, and was associated with greater LV hypertrophy. sST2 expression and clinical associations may be sex-specific.